Clinic Broadband welcomes contributions from individuals with genuine expertise in broadband, connectivity, networking, and related fields. This includes practitioners, researchers, engineers, analysts, and professionals who can provide clear, experience-based insight into how broadband works in real-world contexts. The purpose of this page is to explain what kind of content is suitable for publication and how the submission process works.
Clinic Broadband is an editorial platform, not a commercial one. Contributions must align with the site’s focus on independent, informative content. Articles should aim to explain, analyse, or explore broadband topics in a way that is useful to readers. Suitable submissions include practical guides based on direct experience, thoughtful analysis of developments in broadband infrastructure or technology, and well-argued opinion pieces grounded in evidence. Content that draws on real-world knowledge and clearly explains complex subjects is particularly valued.
Submissions must not be written for promotional purposes. Clinic Broadband does not accept articles that are designed to promote a specific company, product, or service. Guest posts submitted on behalf of commercial clients are not suitable for publication. All contributions should reflect genuine subject knowledge and a clear editorial intent rather than marketing objectives.
All content must be original and not published elsewhere. Accuracy is essential, and any claims that are not widely known should be supported by verifiable and clearly identified sources. Fabricated data, unverified statistics, or invented examples are not acceptable. Articles should be written in UK English and maintain a clear, neutral tone throughout. Promotional language should be avoided, and the writing style should remain consistent with the editorial standards of the site.
The length of submissions will vary depending on the type of article, but contributors are expected to provide enough depth to fully explore the topic. Articles should be structured in a clear and logical way, making them accessible to readers with varying levels of technical understanding.
Before submitting a full article, contributors are required to send a short pitch using the contact form on the website. This pitch should briefly outline the proposed topic, explain the main idea or argument, and include relevant background information about the author. It should also indicate any sources that are likely to be referenced. Clinic Broadband reviews all pitches and typically responds within five working days. If a pitch is accepted, contributors will be invited to submit a full draft.
All accepted articles are subject to editorial review. This process may involve edits for clarity, structure, and consistency with the site’s tone and standards. Contributors will be informed of any significant changes before publication.
Each article must include a short author biography. This should briefly describe the contributor’s professional background and relevant experience, and may include a link to a personal website or professional profile.
By submitting content to Clinic Broadband, you confirm that the work is your own and that you have the right to publish it. You also confirm that publication does not infringe the rights of any third party. Clinic Broadband retains the right to publish, edit, and archive accepted content indefinitely as part of its editorial archive.
Last updated: 8 April 2026
Clinic Broadband is committed to maintaining a high standard of accuracy across all published content. If a factual error is identified, it will be reviewed and corrected where appropriate. Any confirmed correction will be clearly noted within the article so that readers are aware of the update.
If you believe that content on the Site contains a factual inaccuracy, you can request a correction by contacting us through the website. Your request should clearly identify the article in question, describe the specific information you believe to be incorrect, and provide supporting evidence or sources where possible. This helps ensure that all correction requests can be properly assessed.
All requests are reviewed carefully, and a response is typically provided within five working days. Where a correction is justified, the article will be updated and a note will be added to explain what has been changed and why. This ensures transparency and maintains the integrity of the editorial record.
Clinic Broadband distinguishes between factual errors and matters of opinion. Corrections apply only to verifiable inaccuracies. Editorial viewpoints, interpretations, and opinions expressed by contributors are not revised unless they are based on incorrect factual information. Similarly, content will not be altered or removed solely because it is controversial or commercially inconvenient.
If a correction request is declined and you believe this decision is incorrect, you may submit additional evidence for further review. Any new information will be considered, and a follow-up response will be provided within a reasonable timeframe.
